![]() ![]() Oracle has a history of aggressively auditing and seeking license fees from users of the Java SE platform for unlicensed uses. The case hinged on Oracle’s assumed copyright ownership of the Java SE API code itself, and whether use by Google of the Java SE API code constitutes a “fair use” of that material as a matter of law. Without this access, Java developers would be forced to write original code from scratch to perform the same functions. 3 Justice Breyer’s opinion also noted that, to achieve this accessible development environment, Google used approximately 11,500 lines of Java SE code from the application programming interface (API) in its own user interface on the Android platform, which enabled Java-based developers to use the API functionality within the Android environment, allowing them to easily access a library of pre-existing and pre-written java code for certain complex computing functions. The Court’s opinion, penned by Justice Breyer, said that when Google originally acquired Android, it had envisioned building the Android platform as a free and open environment that would allow software developers to use the platform to freely develop Android-based mobile applications, with the expectation that this open development marketplace would increase consumer value and demand for Android-based smartphones that had access to this broad range of applications. ![]() 2 Oracle alleged that Google copied and used a limited portion of the code from the Java SE platform. Oracle America Inc. ruling 6-2 in favor of Google. On Monday, April 5, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the long-standing copyright battle between technology titans, Google LLC and Oracle America, Inc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |